comprehensive immigration reform

Zuraya Tapia-Alfaro's picture

NDN Releases Major Findings on Immigration

Today, NDN released polls conducted among all voters in four key battleground states - Florida, Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada - that show strong support for comprehensive immigration reform. As Simon and Courtney mentioned, the poll was conducted in key swing states that also have a large Hispanic Population. Additionally, the states in question are reflective of the cross-section of Hispanics in the United States, with Florida's Hispanic population consisting mainly of foreign-born Hispanics from the Caribbean and South America, Nevada with mostly foreign-born Hispanics from Mexico, and New Mexico and Colorado with largely native-born Hispanics.

For an in-depth look at how the public views the immigration debate in these four states, please view our full Immigration Survey Report here.

As stated in the Executive Summary, our findings indicate that in each of these four states, voters:

  • Overwhelmingly support Comprehensive Immigration Reform as:
    1. Strengthening border security
    2. Strengthening interior enforcement through an employer verification plan
    3. New visa program for 200,000 workers annually
    4. Increasing the number of family visas available
    5. Path to earned citizenship for the undocumented once they meet certain requirements.
  • Have a positive view of undocumented immigrants, believing that they have come here to work and seek a better life, are not taking jobs from American citizens and are not interested in receiving public handouts.
  • Blame the federal government and businesses - not immigrants - for the broken immigration system. This tells us that the anti-immigrant message of the Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaughs of the world actually doesn't resonate with the large majority of voters.

The data also shows:

  • The issue of immigration remains an important issue to voters, particularly Hispanics, and Democrats and Barack Obama are more trusted to handle the immigration issue than U.S. Sen. John McCain and the Republican Party.
  • The dramatic swing of Hispanic voters to Senator Obama in Florida, Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada - with a total of 46 electoral votes - has helped turn these previously red states, which were critical to Bush's narrow victory in 2004, into competitive swing states this year.
  • But in each state, 14 percent to 20 percent of the Hispanic electorate remains undecided, which translates into a two percent to six percent of the statewide vote in each state - a percentage significant enough to tip dead-even states into one camp or the other.
  • The Hispanic vote may very well determine the Presidential winner in these four states. Given how close the election is, this may determine the outcome of the Presidential race itself.

Therefore, the data proves that the paranoia over the prospect of dealing with the broken immigration system due to the emotional nature of the debate as framed by anti-immigrant activists is unfounded. An overhaul of our current immigration system is not only the right thing to do, there is an urgent need for it and the data demonstrates that there is overwhelming support to enact it. Enforcement-only is not an immigration policy. We need to fix the entire broken system. Just this morning, USA TODAY's Emily Bazar wrote a story reporting how the higher application fees at ICE are actually discouraging immigrants from seeking citizenship. Even Mark Krikorian, Executive Director of the research center for a series of anti-immigrant hate groups, CIS, which calls for reduced immigration agrees fees are, "probably too high" and should reflect only processing costs.

When it comes to immigration reform, our data matches the data from the many polls conducted on this issue for the last three years: politically, immigration is actually a positive and not a negative because voters want action, and from a policy standpoint there is a consensus to enact it.

 

 

 

Marisa McNee's picture

I.C.E Ends Self-deport Program

I suppose most of us saw this coming...

The federal government will scrap a program for illegal immigrants to turn themselves in for deportation after only eight people volunteered during a nearly three-week trial, an official said Thursday.


And yet, I find myself rather stunned at the ongoing incompetence. They tried for three weeks. They spent $41,000 to advertise the program and then gave it only three weeks?


After years of rounding people up and scaring the hell out of immigrant communities by tearing families apart, making people disappear and allowing people to die while in custody, ICE calls it quits after three-weeks and, predictably, blames the immigrants and immigration advocates:

The bottom line is it is not effective," Hayes said. "Quite frankly, I think this proves the only method that works is enforcement...Hayes said lack of support from those activists shows they are unwilling to accept any enforcement."They want amnesty, they want open borders, and they want a more vulnerable America," he said. Hayes told the AP that other tactics have proven more effective. ICE has been tracking down so-called immigration "fugitives" by knocking on their doors at home, often during pre-dawn hours.


Apparently it's not "enforcement" unless they're hunting people down and dragging them out of their homes in the middle of the night.


Pathetic.


Note to Congress: Comprehensive immigration reform is the only answer.


Note to the GOP: Throw the nativist, xenophobic Know-nothings over board...they're in the way of a responsible solution.

Carolina Rizzo's picture

Lincoln Díaz-Balart ataca a Obama

El Congresista Republicano Lincoln Díaz-Balart acusó abiertamente ayer a Obama de no tener idea del problema migratorio. Declaró también que es absurdo que Obama trate de tomar crédito por su lucha por reforma migratoria, ya que -según el- Obama trabajó en contra de la reforma migratoria integral.

Lo que es absurdo es que se critique a alguien que - a diferencia de McCain- ha mantenido su posición a favor de una reforma migratoria desde el principio. Es ridículo también que se le acuse de ir en contra de la reforma cuando fue verdaderamente un líder en buscar una reforma balanceada, presionando al Congreso para que encontrara una solución que reflejara un acuerdo o término medio entre las dos posiciones, introduciendo enmiendas que hubiesen priorizado mantener la unidad de los inmigrantes con sus familias y castigado a aquellos empleadores que contrataran inmigrantes ilegales.

Asímismo, Obama, conjuntamente con el Representante Demócrata de Illinois Luis Gutierrez, introdujo el Acta de Promoción de Ciudadanía (el cual controla los precios de las solicitudes de ciudadanía para asegurar que sean justos y razonables). Obama también introdujo legislación que fue aprobada en el Senado para mejorar tanto la rapidez como la exactitud de las investigaciones de antecedentes que realiza el FBI como parte del proceso para obtener la ciudadanía.

¿Cómo, entonces, puede tener la osadía el Sr. Díaz-Balart de denunciar a un candidato que ha mantenido su posición firmemente sobre una reforma migratoria integral, produciendo respuestas y soluciones genuinas a uno de los problemas que más incomoda a nuestra nación? Y especialmente cuando el candidato al que el Sr. Díaz-Balart respalda, el Sen. Mc Cain, ha cambiado su posición notablemente. Consideremos principalmente que dicho cambio de opinión cumplió un rol instrumental en que el proyecto de ley McCain-Kennedy (su propio proyecto), que presentaba una reforma migratoria amplia e integral, no fuera aprobado en el Senado. Mi pregunta es; ¿Cómo podemos apoyar a un candidato que no se apoya a sí mísmo?